What Happens When They Have the Shields AND the Spears

I fight with a spear about 90% of the time.  Of that, my team often will have the range advantage.  As I've said many times in this blog, one of the most fundamental tactical decisions you need to make is to determine which team has the range advantage.  If its the other team, then you need to press them hard or charge.  Recently I had some experience where the other team had both the range advantage as well as the shield advantage, and it challenged us on a tactical level.

In a couple of series of 4v4 battles in a small field, one team would have three shields and one spear, while the other team had no spears and either all poles, or a mix of poles and spears.  Normally you wouldn't want to charge a line (all else being equal) that had more shields than you, but in a situation where the other team has a good spear and you have none, you really have little choice but to neutralize and/or take out that spear. 

In one of our sessions, we kept sending our best shieldman straight at the spear, and he was never successful.

What was happening was that the pole to the left of the spear had the surprising situational awareness (he was a very new fighter) to take a passing shot at the sheildman's back as he'd run by.  The spear was also able to withdraw just a bit and put up a defense as the charge was coming directly in.

We were never able to figure out how to win this scenario during the practice. 

At this point I'd like to step in and point out two big errors that I often see at SCA practices.  One is that they often would rebalance the teams to make sure that each side has the same ability levels and weapon types in order to make the fight "fair."  The other that I see (less common) is that they will leave two sides unbalanced and just let one team slaughter the other over and over again throughout the day.  There is, of course, a happy medium.

In this case, we were struggling, but not getting slaughtered in an un-winnable fight, and just needed to figure out how to beat this scenario.

A few more weeks passed and we found the opportunity to run the scenario again.  This time it was 3 shields and a spear versus 4 poles, and the pole team actually managed to win about half of the scenarios.  Now, winning a scenario often comes down to ability level, and we did have the more experienced fighter, but we were still able to figure out some tactics to improve our chances. 

This time the poles were coming in from the flanks and using the other team members as "picks," or rather, using them to block each other.

From the right flank, I was using a very inexperienced shieldman on the inside to pick a more experienced flanker.  On the left, our left pole used a large flanker to hide behind.  Positioning and timing in each case is essential.  Also, making a move at the fighter that you intend to use as a pick is helpful as it will often discourage them from making a passing shot.

It also appeared that the kills on the spear were a little easier as we were coming in from steep angles rather than from directly in front of him.

One thing to note, when making a charge into a group of fighters like this, you need to make sure you go all the way through, out the back side, and reestablish your front to the fight (and your back away from your enemies).

FWIW, this is one reason why I like to fight with the spear out in front.  One might think that it just makes it easier to get to the spear, but what ends up happening is the spear will take one or two steps back to safely avoid the charge while the rest of the line collapses on whomever is going after the spear.  I've been doing this for decades, but every now and then we'll experiment with it and verify that it is still a very effective tactic.


Other Related Thoughts

Triangulate the Spears

In a few of our fights each side had two spears.  I almost always prefer to have the spears split so that you can effectively triangulate the attacks.  I definitely noticed the benefits in this series of battles. 




In the above picture, red spears had really good angles on the green spears.  Each red spear only has to worry about guarding one side of their body, while the green spears have to worry about shots coming from both sides.

Caveat:  I don't usually like having spears protecting the flanks,  I was a bit surprised the the green shield was not able to exploit the weakened flank, but I was not on that side to see what was happening.


Don't Turtle Up

In one of our series of fights, our flanking shieldman was employing a very common tactic, one that is actually taught in a lot of SCA groups and its one that I don't think is very effective.  In fact, one of our friendly knights was teaching this at an Atlantian practice, and the Anglesey fighters told him that they disagreed with the approach.

"Turtling Up," is when the flanking shieldman stays tight against the group, allows the opponent to out flank him, and then turns his back toward his own line.

In this specific example, the shields were able to approach our line without exposing their open side, and it was preventing our spear (me) from even throwing shots in their direction because I'd have to turn my side to the opposing spears.



If that sheildman can extend the flank, it opens up angles on the open sides of those shields, and pushes their line back a bit so that I don't have to expose myself as much to the opposing spears.




Know When You are Out Gunned

The final thought here is that we had a fight last week where each side had two spears.  I'm about as experienced as any spearman out there, but the other team had TWO spearman who had been fighting since the 80s.   My team often relies on me to take the lead in the attacks, but I just could not hold these two off.  We had to adjust our tactics and start pressing them.

Highland River Melees (organization on a bridge and other topics)

We fought at the Northern Atlatian event Highland River Melees last weekend and had a lot of fun despite the hot conditions.  In a nutshell, the northern region of Atlantia of the past couple of decades has developed a really laid back culture at their melee events, while also bringing a reasonably good level of competition.  At the end of the day, there is no prize for winning, and the individuals will be judged subjectively on their merit and their comportment rather than counting kills and deaths.  If a melee is run well, sides will be chosen so that most of the fights are competitive, so why not just keep everything relaxed and fun?  Its a sparring session or a pickup game, not the finals of crown.

I recently noted to someone after observing the great attitude of an East Kingdom Knight, "When you're the best tourney fighter in the land, there's two ways to protect your ego in a melee.  You can blow off everything or you can take everything.  Either way, people won't REALLY know how good you were that day.  One way will make you enemies while the other makes you friends."


Heat

Sir Tash runs a great event and is a shining example of what a knight should be (full disclosure, Tash is a friend of mine BUT resides in a different kingdom, so I get no brownie points for sucking up).  We had given him some constructive feedback about the scenarios and he let us know that his first priority was everyone's safety in the heat, and reminded us that we did have a fighter have to leave the field as a result, so points were well taken.

In general, however, the Bog Celts prefer repeating scenarios a few times before moving on.  It seems like a more efficient way to cram in some fighting with less standing around in the heat.  Again, the heat was a wild card that day.

I'd also like to add that there are ways that you can mitigate the heat.  I've worked on this a lot over the last 5 years, in particular, and here's what has worked for me:

- Cardio;  The better you're cardio, the better you will handle the hot weather fighting.
- Heat acclimation;  Get outside as much as possible and make yourself sweat.
- Hot weather tunic;  My upper arms breathe.  This alone may make the biggest difference.
- Water:  I try to drink 1-2 liters of water before the fighting begins, plus regular hydration during the fighting.

Hot weather vs cold weather tunics
(photos by Korrin Villman & Ursus)

Bridge Battle
We fought two bridge battles.  In the first one we got our butts kicked, while we won the second one fairly decisively.  Each battle had two ballistas pointed at one team (teams changed sides) giving that team a disadvantage.  It was, IMO, only a small disadvantage and drove the expediency of the tactics.  Either team could have lost or won from either side depending on the tactical decisions made by both sides.

So what happened?

First of all, our team was made up of a mix of Bog Celts and Atlantians.  Most of our shields were Atlantians while most of the spears and poles were Celts.  Having a mixed group tends to create a level of disorganization as neither group is used to working with each other.  The other side was 100% Atlantians.  Though they are less experienced working with each other (due to a mix of houses) than the Bog is with itself, they are more experienced than the mix of Bog and Atlantians.  They also had King Christoph as their leader, which gives them a well defined command structure.

So, what did we do wrong?  No commander.  No organization.  We began with a shieldwall on the front line who stood there and never pressed (they were given no command to do so).  We had a plethora or spears sitting in the back not doing anything.  We never had more than one spear on the front line, often not throwing any shots.  What did I do?  I started off on the wrong side of the bridge.  By the time I moved to the other side, I got shot by an archer, possibly the best thing that could have happened to me as I got to watch us die horribly (a good learning experience).

The Atlantians did the right thing.  They treated themselves like gate defenders and put up a shield wall and stalled the fight, allowing the ballistas to whittle us down.

Note:  Only one spear up front (photo by Ursus)

The Fix

So there's really only two ways to win a battle like this when you need to attack a gate and get through it before other elements beat you.  Most scadians would look at this situation and say that we should have charged.  I don't believe that would have been very effective.  The Atlantian team was built better for a close range battle as they had more shields with a handful of high level talent (King Christoph and Sir Felix coming to mind).

The other method is to attack aggressively with spears.  This means, for the width of this bridge, four on the front line.  And if you are on the front line, you are throwing shots fast and aggressively!  We may still have lost the battle, but we would have gone down swinging, and we likely would have taken some of them with us.


Bridge 2 Results

I surveyed our group to see who would be the most fit for command and, well, it appeared that I would have been as good as anyone.  I spoke to the warlord of Galatia to get some thoughts from him, and then decided to give the group a little pep talk and get them organized.

Every bridge needs to begin either ready to charge, or ready to repel a charge.  This means shields to the front, so we did that and got our shield wall established.  Then I got the spears to move to the sides to clear out the crowding in the middle.  This allows you to charge and repel charges a little more effectively, and also sets up a natural queue so that spears know who will be up next to fight.

Another issue I've noticed with fights like this is that the shields on the front can't see what's behind them, and most spears don't feel comfortable telling a fighter they don't know to move so that they can take their spot.  This meant that someone would have to do that for them, which fell on me.  As much as I wanted to fight, I thought it best to stay out of the fight and facilitate and let the others do the killing.  Often times the fight will come to me, anyway.

Once we got set up and lay on was called, the Atlantian team immediately charged to avoid the ballista bolts.  A few years ago I preferred to have more spears up in the front, but have since noticed that it really weakens the line against charges.  So I've since gone with more of a mix on the front line.  If this results in us facing more spears than we are willing to put up on the line, then WE need to charge.

We successfully repelled the charge.  The spears sank back into the ranks, shields took their places, and the poles moved into the second rank.  Keeping the rest of the spears to the sides allowed for this to happen very naturally. 

There were a couple of elements that I found interesting.  King Christoph thought that they may have called the charge too soon.  He wanted to avoid attrition due to the ballista fire, but thinks that he may have pushed his army right into a kill pocket off the end of the bridge.  He would have preferred drawing us into the middle of the bridge first.  Duke Vladimir (on our team) thought that the Bog just did what the Bog does, and that we are really good at repelling charges, which I don't disagree with.  Though our mix of weapons makes us ill equipped to initiate charges, we do seem to have the experience and the weapons mix to repel them (and if that sounds crazy, then maybe I'm crazy and we should have charged in the first battle).

I actually felt that the Atlantian team was really close to winning the battle due to a weakness on our left corner.  I wrote a blog once citing this as a potential Achilles heal in gate defenses and was told in the comments section that it would never happen.  Oh, yes it does.  I see it happen all of the time, and it very nearly happened this time.

Essentially, if the defending team does not secure the far left corner, a right handed shieldman can push through it and get into the backfield.  As they pressed, I managed to kill the first fighter to come up by stabbing him in the belly.  The second one made it through and very nearly killed me.  I was saved by a decent spear defense (I blocked the first shot and then pressed my spear tip against his sword) and having Arundoor (a very experienced and highly talented melee fighter) come up and save me.  Had that corner fallen, the Atlantians may have been able to surround us, and considering that we had a lot of spears in the backfield, they may have been able to chop them down.

Left Picture:  4 spears up front.  Shields mixed in.  Spears in columns on the side
Right Picture:  Left most red shield threatens to break through corner.  White spear and shield deny.

Field Skirmish Maneuver

There was one maneuver that stood out in my mind.  I was part of a single death field skirmish that was about 7 on 7.  On my right was Sir Felix, who was probably the best 1v1 fighter on the field.  Across from him was Arundoor, who is an excellent melee fighter and though his 1v1 skills are quite good, he felt that the odds were not in his favor against Felix.  He even called out, "Okay, you guys are going to have to win this one.  I won't be able to help."

As I moved up, my initial thought was that Sir Felix may jump Arundoor, and I'd either stab him in the gut, or would threaten the stab allowing Felix easier attacks.  Arundoor saw this and countered by moving out to his left and getting to the outside of Felix.  This meant that if I moved in, it would pull me completely out of the main fight and I'd have to turn my back to the battle.  So, instead, I turned toward the rest of the fight hoping that Felix could at least keep Arundoor occupied.

After that, Treason, a newer fighter, yet a very fit, young, former marine, saw an opportunity to jump me and my wingman.  He came in so fast that my only chance to survive was to let him pass by, and then circle around him and turn back toward the battle front from the other side.  I'm usually very successful with this maneuver, but Arundoor was able to see it quickly and respond.  He made a move at Felix, threw a "safe shot," and then carried his momentum toward me and killed me before I could reestablish myself in the fight.  Maneuvers like this, as well as my maneuver, are mostly instinctual built from years and years of relatively unstructured melee practice.

See the pictures below for a play by play (all photos by Ursus):

Drexel Fight Practice: 3v5 restricted

Last night we had another great fight practice on the Drexel University campus in Philly.  We did two main battle types, both were 3v5 with the three most experienced fighters on the same team.  The team of 5 had four well trained melee fighters with 1-3 years of experienced each (consisting of 20-30 melee practices or events per year) and a fighter in his 3rd practice (with a bit of hema and fencing background). 


Fighting System

There are many different organizations that do some form of reenactment fighting.  Our main system is the SCA (rattan weapons & armor) but we've also done some Markland (rattan and foam weapons & some armor) as well as Daggorhir (foam weapons, no armor required).  When we created this practice last year, we ultimately chose to go with the Markland system because the lower armoring requirements made it easier to get new fighters suited up on the spot.  I currently have 5 spare helmets and enough hockey gloves, pads, etc. to get people into gear pretty fast (I even just finished making the Dick Flap of Shame for those who don't bring a cup).  Our original intention was to also have a foam only group, but we found that the skills did not transfer to the armored fighting very well, and that very few foam fighters were interested in armored fighting.

This year we made some significant changes.  Though we still use the Markland armoring and weapons system, we've changed to using SCA rules as we found that the Markland rules were creating some bad habits (different rules for engagement and hands are legal targets in Markland). 


Training Philosophy
We use a very different philosophy than most of what I have seen in the SCA.  We focus a lot of effort on making practices fun and give people the freedom and flexibility to try different things.  We do almost no drilling, but rather just run scenarios over and over again and let people experiment with different tactics, and then we discuss what worked, what didn't work, and why. 


Challenges of the 3v5

Again, we put all of the veterans on one team, and the least experienced fighters on the other team.  Normally when we do this, we'll shift fighters back and forth as needed.  Because of the low numbers in this scenario, we left ourselves the option to sit a fighter out if need be.  So if the 5 are overwhelming the 3, one of the 5 could sit out a fight to make it a 3v4.  Also of note, the field size was restricted (due mainly to out lighting situation) which prevents the three from being able to out maneuver the 5.  We may open the field a bit in future variations.

The red team figured out that they would be in bad shape if one of the veteran shields got into the backfield, so they did a good job of securing the flanks.  Spears on both teams tried to control the middle of the field.  The red spear's main job was not trying to get kills, but rather to neutralize the green spear (me).  Occasionally I'd try to make an attack against one of his teammates, and he was really good at countering getting quick kills on me on multiple occasions.  The red team also knew that if their spear died, they had no choice but to charge as they would be facing a veteran spear with no one to neutralize him.  Charging against 3 veterans may feel risky, but at least they'd have a chance.  If they did't charge, they had no chance.

In order for green to win, it is critical to get an early kill.  Usually the early kill would come from the spear, but occasionally one of the shields would find a weakness in the line to exploit. 

Red definitely won most of the battles (more than 2/3 if I remember correctly).  Whenever green won, it was generally because they were able to react more quickly than red once the fight broke down.  In those fights, often red would mount a charge and the green fighters would find a way to rotate out of the fight and to drag red into 1v1 fights. 

Hypothetical:  Green right flanker pivots to outside.  Green left flanker shoots
straight for the spear.  Green spear gets past red spear tip and
only has to defend against pole before reposting in the backfield.

In one case, green was down to a 1v3 and managed to pull out a win by pivoting off of a legged red fighter.

One thing I would have liked to have seen would be for red to charge immediately to overwhelm green.


3v5 Broken Field Battle

The other scenario we ran was a 3v5 broken field resurrection battle.  Those battles tend to play out similarly to the single death field battles, except that the pace slows down a bit, and instead of a straight up 3v5, it often gets broken down into a 1v2 and a 2v3.  Fighters on both teams of to constantly make small adjustments and implement small team tactics on the fly. 

The two most valuable lessons that come from these fights are:

1)  If you are down a fighter or two, you can always back up toward your rez point to reinforce more quickly.

2)  If they are down a fighter or two, you'd better jump on the opportunity, because it won't be long before they reinforce.


The Long View

The biggest benefit we get from these battles is simply a constant reinforcement of sound tactics.  Every time we do one of these scenarios, the team of new people start off losing, and then they get to the point where they are unbeatable.  This is a good thing, because it means that they are figuring out tactics on their own, and that they will take that knowledge to the battle field with them.  If they are constantly told what to do, where to stand, when to charge, etc. they only learn to do what they are told and nothing more.

As I said earlier, the biggest difference between the veterans and the newer fighters, is that the veterans can think more quickly on their feet.  That comes from years and years of experience of doing these kinds of battles.  If we can keep these battles fun, and keep fighters coming out, then the new fighters will gain that kind of experience as well.

Pell, Singles, and Melee Training - Finding the Right Balance

Before I started my blog on melee tactics I had a fairly popular "blog" (actually a location on a web forum with links) on run training for triathletes (I was a D1 collegiate distance runner and competed as a triathlete as an adult some time later in the early 00's).  While everyone understood that there needed to be a balance between swim, bike, and run training, they had the hardest time wrapping their head around the fact that there also needed to be a balance between different types of training, specifically fast and slow training.

The best analogy I had heard utilized a recipe for tomato sauce.

You begin with tomatoes and notice that it tastes a little bland, so you add some garlic and notice that garlic improves the taste.  Most athletes then assume that garlic is the best ingredient, get rid of the tomatoes, and dump a pile of garlic on their pasta.  When it doesn't taste very good, they simply add more garlic.

Likewise, if training specifically for the purposes of melee fighting, one must balance pell work to work on fundamental shot mechanics, singles fighting to learn how to put an opponent down quickly and effectively while also developing a solid defense, and melee fighting to learn how to work with other fighters.

I've heard more than a few people say that one needs only to work on singles (and/or pell work) and that it will all transfer into melee.  To those that firmly believe this, I have to ask what percentage of soccer, lacrosse, basketball, and hockey practices are spent working on singles skills?

Part of the inspiration for this post was noticing how quickly some of the fighters I've been working with have developed a great understanding of team work and the ability to think and react quickly, but then realizing that a couple of our fighters have done very little singles work and almost no pell work.  I found ourselves in situations where I couldn't leave a wingman for fear that he couldn't survive if a 1v1 engagement was thrust upon him against a good fighter, or that even in a 2v1 there were certain shots that were not available making it difficult to take down a high level fighter.

These are all in relative terms.  All of the fighters are doing great and have improved quite a bit, but I like to think about what the shortest pole in the tent is, currently.  As I once told a varsity basketball team I coached, "Today we will work on rebounding, not because you are bad at it, but because you have improved everywhere else such that this is now the weakest skill." 

The difficult part comes with figuring out how to get in the right balance.  If 10 people show up to the next practice, there is no way in hell I'm going to want to spend the day working on singles.  ;)



EDIT:  for those who may be curious, google The BarryP Plan and you will find a number of links to my running plans for triathletes.  Or you can probably just go to this one I found:

http://www.jasonmcgee.me/barryp/running.html

Resurrection Battles - Rez in Groups vs. Rez Individually

Rez in Groups or Individually

So this question has come up a few times recently and the answer is, it depends entirely on the level of the fighter, specifically regarding field awareness and understanding of their job on the field.

During an text exchange last night with Anglesey's most experienced melee fighter, we were discussing the tactics of 2v2 fighting, and this is what I had to say (paraphrased):

There are three approaches to this scenario:

Beginner - don't fight a 2v2.  Instead, reform with your unit.  This is, by and large, what the SCA does with the bulk of their fighters who mainly practice singles and have fewer than 4 years experience.

Intermediate - charge if you have the advantage.  This is ideally where you would want your unbelt champions team to be on a tactical level. 

Advanced - understand the advantages and disadvantages of splitting your unit, dragging fighters out, turning the corner, drawing a charge and turning your opponent into your teammate, etc. and being able to to accomplish all of this quickly and without thinking about it.

Any tactically fluid sport (basketball, hockey, lacrosse, soccer, etc.) is going to have fundamentals that are applied differently at different levels of play.  The lower levels typically must have simpler, more structured fundamentals that can be executed without making mistakes.  At the high levels, more flexibility is given to the individual to improvise knowing that they will improvise well, and that their teammates will also know how to react to the improvisation accordingly.


Applying this to Resurrections

Fundamentally I am opposed to resurrecting in groups.  Rather, you should resurrect immediately and then go and find a group to join.  Many fighters fail horribly at the second part, which is why they are told to resurrect in groups.

Singles fighting teaches you to fight every fight with the intention of trying to win regardless of the insurmountable odds.  It also doesn't prepare you for thinking tactically, so a person resurrecting by themselves may walk into a field, come up upon a knight, and engage in a fight that he will ultimately lose.  If that person had waited to walk in with a group of three people, they can defeat the knight. 

The problem with waiting is that there are people in the battle who need support, and the longer a person waits at the rez point, the longer they are without support.  Ideally a fighter would resurrect immediately, walk out into the field, come up upon a knight, and simply avoid fighting him until they either find a group of fighters to join or until a group finds him.

So in a nutshell, beginning fighters probably should be resurrecting in groups.  I am of the belief, however, that one should attempt to learn how to be effective without doing this, but if you rez by yourself, make certain that you know what you are going to do.

Green gains a +2 number's advantage because their fighters did not
wait for a triad to forum before returning to the battle.

Range Tactics for 2v2 Combinations Explained

Last night we had our first melee practice on the college campus with 6 fighters showing up.  After working on some singles fundamentals that were needed from the fighters who don't normally attend SCA practices, we did a 2v2 Endless Resurrection Melee.

Again, if you've forgotten, we begin with teams of 2.  If you die, you go to the rez point and wait for another person to die.  As soon as two people are at rez, the two of you form up a new team, enter the ring, and immediately start fighting anyone else in the melee field.  I prefer to rope off a medium sized area to keep people from running away as a way to survive a fight (though not a terrible tactic, but we are here to learn to fight).

The best aspect of this scenario is that it teaches the fighters to develop small team tactics very quickly.  You have to assess your weapon, your partner's weapon, each others general talent and experience, the side that you are fighting on (left or right) and then all of those same components regarding your opponents.  All of this has to be assessed very quickly before an attack is initiated.

In this kind of fast paced chaos, it is the simplest tactics to employ that become the most important, and in this case that tactic is simply identifying who has the range advantage, whether or not you should be charging, and then coordinating the charge.

So your options are as follows:

You have longer weapons - immediately begin stabbing

They have longer weapons - immediately charge, together

Weapon types are similar - neutral fight


Now you might be thinking, "Why don't the shields just always charge?"  There are a few reasons.  They might be tired.  They might not be tired but don't know if their partner is tired.  They may both be ready to charge, but each is waiting for the other person to call a charge.  They may not realize that they both have shields.  etc. etc.  This is why we practice this.


The Weapons Combinations and Range Tactics
Last night we had six fighters;  two spears, two shields, and two poles.  The following combinations of 2v2 melees can take place.  If you want, read through each one and take a second to decide what course of action would you take in each situation.  Charge immediately?  Thrust from a distance?  Or would it be a neutral fight?


spear, spear vs pole, pole
spear, spear vs pole, shield
spear, spear vs shield, shield
pole, pole vs shield, shield
pole, pole vs spear, shield
shield, shield vs pole, spear
spear, pole vs spear, pole
spear, pole vs spear, shield
spear, pole vs pole, shield
spear, shield vs spear, shield
spear, shield vs shield, pole
pole, shield, vs pole, shield



ANSWERS:

Though the answers may be overly simple and obvious, quick decision making is often the key to winning these engagements and improves through regular practice.

East Kingdom Southern Army Practice 2

Hey all,

Had an excellent practice in the humidity yesterday and wanted to give a quick thank you to everyone who made it happen!

Just a few thoughts that I wanted to highlight here.


Allied Champs Capture the Flag Battle

This is a very fun warmup battle.  We went for almost a half an hour in a capture the flag rez battle where each dead person has to go back to their side and wait for a timed release.  The goal is to capture the other team's flag and return it to their side for a point.

We've done a lot of these and I really like them as it slows the fighting down enough and the situations end up repeating themselves such that it gives everyone a chance to learn what does and doesn't work, how to communicate, send out commands, etc.  In fact, many of the scenarios I run at our Anglesey East practice are very similar in nature.

Case in point;  I've noticed that a weakness we have as a unit right now is that we don't have a good left flank shieldman.  What does that mean?  Generally speaking I put shieldmen into four categories.  Left flank, right flank, middle of the unit, and special teams.  Middle of the unit guys are often your big guys who can lead or repel charges and can push people around, but also lack the mobility to play the other roles.  Right flankers are your killers.  They need to be able to move out fast, get around some people, and win 1v1 fights if necessary, or doubling up 2v1.  These guys need to be mobile but also have great sword skills.  Special teams is a catch all to fit anything not covered in the other three categories, including sitting in the backfield and looking for holes to plug, sneaking up on the front line and looking for a pulse charge opportunity, or leaving the unit altogether and creating chaos.

The left flanker, however, needs to be able to keep people out of the back field and survive.  If they can kill as well, that's great, but the most important job is to secure the flank and stay alive.

Having said all of that, this battle was a perfect opportunity to work the left flank and let Knuter (aka The Jolly Green Giant, aka a handful of nicknames that are not family friendly) hold the outside position.  The job was simply to stay alive, keep anyone from getting around his shield side, and to hit or kill anyone who tries to get to his spearman (me).  100% of the fight he was the far left flank.  (My belief is that 95% of the time, the extreme flanks should either be occupied by shields, or have a shield ready to replace a spear if there's a press.  I will often take that position with a spear, but everyone around me needs to know that if I get charged, I'm not holding the position). 

We did very well with that position, also being backed up by Rygus, our pole arm fighter.  We often had them curled back toward their resurrection point.  I was told by several people that they tried to mount charges on me, but that they failed because one of these two would take them out, so good on them!

The downside was that we often could get them down to a 3 on 2 advantage, or even a 3 on 1, with the 1 curling us back in toward other fighters in the middle of the field.  This was where a lack of individual singles fight skill became a problem and something that we will work more on in our next practice.  If anything, we will work on how you can jump a single sheildman who posseses a good defense. 

As for everyone else, some critiques I heard on the battle were that people were coming out of rez points and not really coordinating as teams.  Instead of groups of 2-3 fighters coordinating together, there were a lot of single fighters working alone.  This is something that everyone will need to work on and I think will only get better by practicing these scenarios.


Not Really an Allied Champs Battle

This is a great scenario, but it doesn't truly reflect an Allied Champs Battle (nothing wrong with that) except for maybe the final stages of a round right before the flag is captured. 

Typically an Allied Champs battle is a grand spear fight with one side being whittled down faster than the other.  Often both flanks will gradually fall (each side pushes their own right flank), one falling faster than the other.  As the line approaches one of the flags, there's a quick coordinated push toward the flag usually lead by a couple of shields and followed by a pole or shieldman with a gauntlet who will grab at the flag.  The typical starting position is pretty packed, however, with lots of spears (pictured below):





Bridge Battles
The bridge battles were a bit of a mess.  That's not to say that they weren't run well, or that they didn't have value.  I think we all got really great practice in these scenarios.  Personally I've been working the left flank a lot more, though historically I've always been more comfortable on the right flank.  As a left handed spearman, I'm noticing an interesting tradeoff.  On the right I've always had a really good line on all of the spears toward the center of the bridge and am able to get off shots without sacrificing too much defense.  From the left side I have to throw across my body, which is a little slower, a little less accurate, and leaves me more vulnerable to spears directly across from me.  It does give me some really good opportunities on the guts, hips, and legs of shieldman in the front rank which is something that I'm not used to, so its been fun going at the shieldmen a little more.

I also think that others got some great experience defending against spears, fighting with spears, charging, calling charges, reading charges, learning to push people off the bridge, etc.  The reason why I say it was a mess is that we were little light in terms of numbers yesterday which I think really takes away from the experience.  Maybe if we had narrowed the bridge up it would have helped.

But then again, sometimes that's what you get in a bridge or pass battle, so it is worth working on.


3v3 Battles

We finished off the day with a series of 2v2, 3v3, and 4v4 fights before the humidity killed us.  There were a couple points that came up.  One was that each side should always come up with a plan.  It doesn't have to be a grand plan, but there needs to at least be some discussion about what is going to happen.  "I'll take the left, you take the right."  "Lets jump these guys."  "I'm going to go far out to the right."  "Bob, you take out Fred."  etc.  It needs to be something so that you are all at least on the same starting point.


Lead with the Long Weapon

If I know I won't screw up my shieldman, I've been using this tactic successfully for two decades, and its one I rarely see used.  It won't necessarily work for everyone, but I've managed to make it work for me.

I lead out with the pole in the front, making it super clear to the two shields to let me start off a full two steps in front of them.





What ends up happening is two things.  The first is that because the other side generally begins with their pole behind the shields, I get a free shot before anyone else at the beginning of the battle, one with which I land with a high enough regularity that it makes this tactic worth it for that reason alone (only one of the three people up front needs a weak defense or a lack of situational awareness).

The other thing that happens is that I become bait.  Each person on the other team individually sees me as a threat with not a strong A range defense (because I don't have a shield) so all three of them try to jump me, allowing my teammates to get good attack opportunities on them.  (One of the knights watching had commented that we won our fights because everyone was trying to kill me allowing our shields to get to them).





Work Together

One of the biggest negatives I saw on the day was a lack of people working together.  All I mean by that is if you have a 3v1, all three fighters need to try to surround the one fighter and attack at the same time.  What I see a lot is a basic instinct to follow the most aggressive fighter and let him attack first.  People will, in fact, hold back if they see another fight go on.  I call this "Bruce Lee-ing the fight."  I have seen, literally on multiple occasions, a single fighter with only a few years experience beat four fighters by himself because they will all run in one at a time, often overconfident because they assume that they have an advantage.

Also, if one of your fighters is a spear, he needs to be the most aggressive and run way out in front in these number advantage fights because he gets free shots from range.  Don't stand in the back and wait for others to do something.  Get out there and throw shots with your 9 foot buffer! 

In a nutshell, stop following each other and work together.

The biggest improvement I saw in a lot of fighters is that they've been better about finishing a fight and IMMEDIATELY looking for the next person to hit.  This has been a weakness in the past and I certainly saw at least a few fighters doing much better about this.